AI coding agents have crossed a threshold in 2026. Tools like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex now run long, semi-autonomous tasks that can take anywhere from ten minutes to several hours. The problem is not the agent's capability — it is the human bottleneck. You kick off a refactor, switch to Twitter for "one minute," and return forty minutes later to discover the agent finished thirty-five minutes ago and has been sitting idle, waiting for a yes-or-no answer it needed to proceed. That gap between "agent done" and "human aware" is where Pushary positions itself.

Pushary is a push-notification platform built specifically for AI coding agents. It intercepts tool-use events before they execute, checks your permission rules, and routes approval requests to your phone as push notifications. You tap approve or deny from your lock screen, the answer flows back to the agent, and the round trip takes seconds. The platform supports Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, Lovable, Hermes, and anything that speaks MCP. Setup is a single npx command and a QR code scan. Updated July 2026.

What Pushary Does

Pushary operates as a control layer between you and your AI coding agent. When the agent encounters a tool call that requires human approval — a file write outside the project directory, a shell command, a network request, or a permission prompt — Pushary intercepts that event before execution. It checks your configured rules, and if the operation needs your input, it sends a push notification to your phone. You see the tool name, the command or action description, and Approve and Deny buttons. One tap sends the decision back to the agent, which continues execution immediately. When the task finishes or fails, you get another notification. The entire interaction happens without unlocking your phone or opening your laptop.

Core Features

Pricing & Plans

ToolRadar may earn a commission if you purchase through this link. Pricing verified from pushary.com/download as of July 2026.

Pros & Cons

✓ What Works

• ✅ Native iOS and Android apps with true lock-screen approval flow
• ✅ Supports 7+ major AI coding agents through MCP and CLI hooks
• ✅ Slack and n8n integration for team-wide approval workflows
• ✅ Setup completes in under two minutes with a single npx command

✗ What Holds It Back

• ❌ No permanent free tier — 7-day trial only, which limits casual evaluation
• ❌ 5,000 notifications/month cap may constrain heavy multi-agent users
• ❌ Parallel agent support is acknowledged by the founder as a future need, not a current strength

Learning Curve

Pushary is among the fastest tools to set up in the AI developer tooling space. The entire onboarding flow consists of installing the mobile app, running one npx command in your terminal, and scanning a QR code. No configuration files, no API keys to manage, no webhook URLs to paste. For developers already comfortable with CLI tools, the setup is effectively instant. For teams, the Slack integration adds a five-minute configuration step. Compared to building a custom approval bot with n8n and Slack webhooks — which can take hours of wiring, testing, and maintenance — Pushary removes the infrastructure burden entirely. The only learning curve is understanding which agent events trigger notifications and how to set permission rules in your agent's skill or rule file. That takes about ten minutes of reading the documentation. Updated July 2026.

Who Should Use Pushary

💡 Community Feedback

How Pushary Compares

Pushary stands out for its breadth of agent support and its deliberate focus on notifications as a product category rather than a feature. Tactic Remote and Grass both offer mobile approval forwarding, but they are positioned as extensions of larger remote-development or cloud-IDE workflows. Pushary's single-purpose design means it integrates with more agents out of the box and offers cleaner team routing through Slack and n8n. The trade-off is that Tactic Remote and Grass may offer deeper IDE integration for users already inside those ecosystems. For developers who want a standalone approval layer that works across every agent they use, Pushary is the more flexible choice. Updated July 2026.

Expert Editorial Opinion

🔍

ToolRadar Editorial Team

AI Developer Tools Coverage

Pushary addresses a genuinely under-served niche. Most AI coding tooling in 2026 focuses on making the agent smarter, faster, or more autonomous. Very little attention goes to the human side of the loop — the moment when the agent needs a decision and the human is not at their desk. Pushary treats that moment as a first-class product problem, not an afterthought. The result is a tool that does one thing extremely well: it closes the latency gap between "agent needs input" and "human provides input."

Technically, the implementation is sound. The MCP-native architecture means Pushary does not require custom adapters for every new agent. As long as an agent speaks MCP or exposes CLI hooks, Pushary can intercept its events. The QR-code pairing is a smart UX choice — it removes the friction of API keys, OAuth flows, or manual configuration. The Slack and n8n integrations show the team understands that approvals are not always individual decisions; in production environments, a team member other than the task initiator may need to sign off.

Where Pushary sits in the broader market is interesting. It is not competing with Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex. It is competing with the habit of keeping a terminal window open on a second monitor and checking it every few minutes. That is a large addressable market of developers who are already paying $20–$200 per month for their agent seat and would pay another $10 to stop babysitting it. The Product Hunt traction and the founder's public iteration with the community suggest the product is moving in the right direction.

The pricing gap is worth examining. At $9.99 per month for 5,000 notifications, Pushary is priced below most AI coding tool subscriptions. The 7-day trial is generous enough to evaluate the core workflow, but the absence of a permanent free tier creates friction for developers who want to test it on a single project before committing. Compared to building a custom Slack webhook — which is free but costs engineering time — Pushary's value proposition is time savings, not cost savings. For a developer billing at $75–$100 per hour, one avoided context-switch pays for the monthly subscription.

Is it worth subscribing without a free tier? For developers running long-horizon agent tasks daily, yes. The time recovered from not checking terminals and not discovering agents stuck on permission prompts is measurable within the first week. For casual users who fire off an agent task once a week, the subscription is harder to justify. The 7-day trial is the deciding factor here — it is long enough to know whether the workflow fits your style. If you find yourself checking your terminal less than twice a day during agent runs, Pushary is probably not for you. If you check it ten times, the subscription pays for itself in reclaimed focus.

AI Developer Tools Reviewed July 2026

Final Verdict

🔗 Related ToolRadar Reviews

❓ Frequently Asked Questions